Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 29
Filter
2.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol ; 40(3): 411-415, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37545829

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Maternal stress, depression and anxiety are associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) in offspring. However, the relationship between maternal obsessive compulsive symptoms (OCS) and AD in their children is unclear. Aim: To investigate whether maternal OCS are associated with AD in offspring. Material and methods: A total of 75 children with AD diagnosed by the paediatric allergist and 76 healthy children and their mothers were included in the study. A Turkish version of the Maudsley Obsessive Compulsive Inventory (MOCI-T) was used to assess OCS of mothers in both groups. Results: Total MOCI-T score and slowness, doubt, and rumination subscale scores were higher in the AD group than in the healthy group (p = 0.007, p = 0.001, p = 0.012 and p = 0.011, respectively) but washing/cleaning and checking subscale scores did not reach a statistically significant difference (p = 0.203 and p = 0.053, respectively). There was no correlation between SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and MOCI-T/subscales scores. Conclusions: Our study provides evidence for associations between maternal OCS and infantile AD. The findings support recommendations for psychosocial support of mothers of children with AD.

3.
Nutrients ; 15(12)2023 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37375617

ABSTRACT

Shellfish, including various species of mollusks (e.g., mussels, clams, and oysters) and crustaceans (e.g., shrimp, prawn, lobster, and crab), have been a keystone of healthy dietary recommendations due to their valuable protein content. In parallel with their consumption, allergic reactions related to shellfish may be increasing. Adverse reactions to shellfish are classified into different groups: (1) Immunological reactions, including IgE and non-IgE allergic reactions; (2) non-immunological reactions, including toxic reactions and food intolerance. The IgE-mediated reactions occur within about two hours after ingestion of the shellfish and range from urticaria, angioedema, nausea, and vomiting to respiratory signs and symptoms such as bronchospasm, laryngeal oedema, and anaphylaxis. The most common allergenic proteins involved in IgE-mediated allergic reactions to shellfish include tropomyosin, arginine kinase, myosin light chain, sarcoplasmic calcium-binding protein, troponin c, and triosephosphate isomerase. Over the past decades, the knowledge gained on the identification of the molecular features of different shellfish allergens improved the diagnosis and the potential design of allergen immunotherapy for shellfish allergy. Unfortunately, immunotherapeutic studies and some diagnostic tools are still restricted in a research context and need to be validated before being implemented into clinical practice. However, they seem promising for improving management strategies for shellfish allergy. In this review, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and management of shellfish allergies in children are presented. The cross-reactivity among different forms of shellfish and immunotherapeutic approaches, including unmodified allergens, hypoallergens, peptide-based, and DNA-based vaccines, are also addressed.


Subject(s)
Food Hypersensitivity , Shellfish Hypersensitivity , Animals , Humans , Child , Shellfish Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/therapy , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Shellfish/adverse effects , Mollusca , Allergens
4.
Medeni Med J ; 37(4): 332-338, 2022 Dec 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36578161

ABSTRACT

Objective: The prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been reported widely. In this study, the prevalence of gastrointestinal system (GIS) involvement in pediatric COVID-19 and its effect on prognosis were investigated. Methods: Children (aged 0-18 years) with acute COVID-19 were included in the study. The patients were grouped according to system involvement: isolated respiratory system (RS), isolated GIS, and combination of both (RS+GIS). These groups were compared in terms of demographic data, clinical characteristics, laboratory and imaging findings, and hospitalization. Results: A total of 223 pediatric patients were included in the study. Of these patients, 19 were asymptomatic, 12 were diagnosed with a multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, 21 had chronic disorders that may affect disease severity, and 27 had symptoms not related to RS or GIS. The remaining 144 patients were classified according to system involvement: 79 (35.4%), 14 (6.3%), and 51 (22.9%) had isolated RS, isolated GIS, and RS+GIS involvement, respectively. The GIS group was much younger than the RS group (median, 30 and 150 months, respectively, p=0.006). Three patients from the RS group were followed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Moreover, 17 (21.5%) and 4 (7.8%) patients from the RS group had severe-critical respiratory symptoms, in the RS+GIS group had severe-critical respiratory symptoms (p=0.039). Conclusions: Our study showed that GIS involvement in children with COVID-19 is more prevalent than RS involvement in the younger age group. Respiratory symptom severity and ICU admission also decreased with accompanying GIS involvement. GIS involvement was still associated with a milder disease course after adjustment for age.

5.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 33(10): e13851, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36282136

ABSTRACT

By the April 12, 2022, the COVID-19 pandemic had resulted in over half a billion people being infected worldwide. There have been 6.1 million deaths directly due to the infection, but the pandemic has had many more short- and long-term pervasive effects on the physical and mental health of the population. Allergic diseases are among the most prevalent noncommunicable chronic diseases in the pediatric population, and health-care professionals and researchers were seeking answers since the beginning of pandemic. Children are at lower risk of developing severe COVID-19 or dying from infection. Allergic diseases are not associated with a higher COVID-19 severity and mortality, apart from severe/poorly controlled asthma. The pandemic disrupted routine health care, but many mitigation strategies, including but not limited to telemedicine, were successfully implemented to continue delivery of high-standard care. Although children faced a multitude of pandemic-related issues, allergic conditions were effectively treated remotely while reduction in air pollution and lack of contact with outdoor allergens resulted in improvement, particularly respiratory allergies. There is no evidence to recommend substantial changes to usual management modalities of allergic conditions in children, including allergen immunotherapy and use of biologicals. Allergic children are not at greater risk of multisystem inflammatory syndrome development, but some associations with Long COVID were reported, although the data are limited, and further research is needed. This statement of the EAACI Section on Pediatrics provides recommendations based on the lessons learnt from the pandemic, as available evidence.


Subject(s)
Asthma , COVID-19 , Hypersensitivity , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes , Child , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Asthma/epidemiology , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
7.
World J Pediatr ; 18(11): 753-760, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35790707

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Personal genetic predisposition and early life environmental factors are important for the development of childhood asthma. We aimed to search whether egg, milk and mite sensitizations at 0-2 years old are risk factors for asthma symptoms at 9-11 years old. METHODS: A total of 210 wheezer children who had specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E in 2010-2012 were included in the study (followed by pediatric allergy). Patients were divided into non-atopic (group 1, n = 157) and atopic patients [groups 2-7, n = 53 (5 patients were in both group 4 and group 5)] based on sensitizations. Using the International Study of Asthma and Allergy in Childhood questionnaire, current wheeze (CW, 2nd question), exercise wheezing (EW, 7th question), and dry cough (DC, 8th question) were surveyed. Also, parental allergies, eczema at 0-2 years, current eosinophil percentage and total IgE were recorded. RESULTS: Eczema was observed as an important risk factor [CW: odds ratio (OR) = 2.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.54-5.23, P ≤ 0.001; EW: OR = 2.71, 95% CI = 1.33-5.54, P = 0.006; DC: OR = 3.03, 95% CI = 1.47-6.25, P = 0.003], whereas having no atopic sensitization at 0-2-year-old (group 1) was found as a significant protective factor for asthma at 9-11 years old (CW: OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.15-0.70, P = 0.004; EW: OR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.10-0.44, P ≤ 0.001; DC: OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.10-0.59, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Early personal eczema is a significant risk factor for the development of asthma symptoms at 9-11 years old, whereas not having an allergic sensitization at 0-2 years old (group 1) is an important protective factor.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Eczema , Hypersensitivity , Allergens , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/etiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Eczema/complications , Eczema/diagnosis , Humans , Hypersensitivity/complications , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin E , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Respiratory Sounds/etiology
8.
Eur J Pediatr ; 181(7): 2839-2847, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35522314

ABSTRACT

The SARS-CoV-2 virus has infected more than 235 million people since it was accepted as a pandemic in March 2020. Although a milder disease is seen in the pediatric age group, the extent of lung damage and its long-term effects are still unknown. In this study, persistent respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function tests were investigated in children with COVID-19. Fifty children with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were included in the study. Patients were evaluated for ongoing respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function tests 3 months after infection. Patients with and without persistent symptoms were compared in terms of demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics and also disease severity. Three months after infection, persistent respiratory symptoms were found to be present in 28% of patients; cough, chest pain and tightness, dyspnea, and exertional dyspnea were the most common symptoms. Three patients had an obstructive deficit, and one had a restrictive deficit. Four patients had impaired diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO). A significant decrease in FEV1/FVC and an increase in lung clearance index were found in the patients with persistent respiratory symptoms. Persistent respiratory symptoms were present in 50% of patients who had severe disease and 12.5% with non-severe disease. DLCO was also significantly lower in the severe disease group.   Conclusions: Our study suggests that the persistence of respiratory symptoms is not related to the severity of acute COVID-19 in children. The inflammatory process due to COVID-19 may continue regardless of its severity, and consequently, peripheral airways may be affected. What is Known: • As compared with adults, children with COVID-19 exhibit a milder disease course and lower mortality rates. However, due to the lack of follow-up studies on children, the long-term effects of their contracting the disease are unknown. What is New: • Although COVID-19 has been thought to have a milder course in children, respiratory system symptoms persist in approximately 30% of patients 3 months after infection. The persistent respiratory symptoms suggest that the inflammatory process due to COVID-19 may continue in some children, even if the clinical findings at admission are not severe, and that the peripheral airways may be affected accordingly.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Child , Dyspnea/etiology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Respiratory Function Tests , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 33(1): e13674, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34601755

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although well described in adults, there are scarce and heterogeneous data on the diagnosis and management of chronic urticaria (CU) in children (0-18 years) throughout Europe. Our aim was to explore country differences and identify the extent to which the EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guideline recommendations for pediatric urticaria are implemented. METHODS: The EAACI Task Force for pediatric CU disseminated an online clinical survey among EAACI pediatric section members. Members were asked to answer 35 multiple choice questions on current practices in their respective centers. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 2,773 physicians of whom 358 (13.8%) responded, mainly pediatric allergists (80%) and pediatricians (49.7%), working in 69 countries. For diagnosis, Southern European countries used significantly more routine tests (eg, autoimmune testing, allergological tests, and parasitic investigation) than Northern European countries. Most respondents (60.3%) used a 2nd -generation antihistamine as first-line treatment of whom 64.8% updosed as a second line. Omalizumab was used as a second-line treatment by 1.7% and third line by 20.7% of respondents. Most clinicians (65%) follow EAACI/WAO/GA2LEN/EDF guidelines when diagnosing CU, and only 7.3% follow no specific guidelines. Some clinicians prefer to follow national guidelines (18.4%, mainly Northern European) or the AAAAI practice parameter (1.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Even though most members of the Pediatric Section of EAACI are familiar with the EAACI/WAO/GA2LEN/EDF guidelines, a significant number do not follow them. Also, the large variation in diagnosis and treatment strengthens the need to re-evaluate, update, and standardize guidelines on the diagnosis and management of CU in children.


Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Urticaria , Adult , Child , Chronic Disease , Chronic Urticaria/diagnosis , Chronic Urticaria/therapy , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urticaria/drug therapy , Urticaria/therapy
11.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 183(1): 68-74, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34518470

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although drug allergy workup for pediatric patients (skin and drug provocation tests [DPT]) is performed, the procedures are troublesome, painful, and time-consuming. The aim of this study was to assess parents' perception of and satisfaction with their child's drug allergy workup. Further, to evaluate parents' tendency to use the tested drug following a negative DPT and the consequences of re-exposure. METHODS: Parents of children that underwent drug allergy workup from January 2017 to August 2020 in the Pediatric Allergy Department of Trakya University Medical Faculty were included. Satisfaction levels were assessed via a telephone questionnaire (3 open-ended, 7 multiple-choice questions). Satisfaction was scored on a Likert scale (1: very unsatisfied and 5: very satisfied). RESULTS: A total of 102 parents participated the study. Fifty-two (51%) of patients were male, and median age was 6.2 years and a median time interval between admission and test appointment of 1 month; 16.7% had a positive drug allergy workup, with 88.3% reporting being satisfied (56.9%) or very satisfied (31.4%) with the workup. Satisfaction levels were inversely related to the time between admission and test appointment (rho: -0.254, p = 0.01), with 8.2% reporting they did not use the tested drug when necessary despite a negative result. The tested drug was used by 35 individuals (41.1%), 33 (94.2%) tolerating without reaction. CONCLUSION: Most parents were satisfied with the workup, but levels were inversely related to the admission and procedure time interval. Drug allergy workup should be performed as soon as possible to relieve parents' anxiety and achieve more patient satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Parents , Personal Satisfaction , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Management , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant , Male , Patient Satisfaction , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 182(9): 835-843, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33946081

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The skin prick test (SPT) is a reliable method to confirm sensitization in IgE-mediated allergic diseases; however, it has been reported to be affected by several personal and environmental factors. Our objective was to determine the factors affecting the skin reactivity to histamine and allergens and investigate whether it differs according to age in terms of reading time. METHODS: A total of 500 patients, aged 4 months-18 years, were enrolled in the study. Wheal and flare reaction sizes were documented as the mean of the longest and the midpoint perpendicular diameter in the 5th, 10th, 15th, and 20th min. Skin reactivity was compared between children >24 and ≤24 months of age. RESULTS: We found larger histamine and allergen wheal sizes in children >24 months than the ones ≤24 months of age (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively). The duration of maximum histamine reactivity was 15 min for children >24 months whereas 10 min for children ≤24 months of age. The number of children losing their histamine reactivity after 15 and 20 min was significantly higher in the smaller age-group. Multiple regression analysis revealed a larger histamine reactivity in children >24 months of age, having obesity, and having allergen sensitization (p = 0.002, p = 0.003, and p = 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSION: It seems more accurate to evaluate SPT after 10 min in children ≤24 months of age. Cutoff values and ideal measurement time according to individual factors such as age, body mass index, or atopy are needed.


Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Skin Tests , Adolescent , Age Factors , Allergens/immunology , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/etiology , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Infant , Reaction Time , Skin/immunology , Skin/pathology , Skin Tests/methods , Skin Tests/standards
13.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 126(5): 569-575, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33493639

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged as a pandemic toward the end of 2019, causing large numbers of people to become infected and die. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether allergic diseases are a risk factor for hospitalization in COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a study including 107 pediatric patients after COVID-19 recovery. The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood Phase 3 questionnaires were distributed together with a detailed history of environmental factors and an allergic evaluation including skin prick tests, specific immunoglobulin E tests, and spirometry. We investigated the prevalence of allergic diseases and evaluated the factors associated with hospitalization in COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 61 (57%) patients were hospitalized and 46 (43%) patients were followed closely in the outpatient clinic. The prevalences of allergic rhinitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis, and episodic wheezing were 10.3%, 6,5%, 4.7%, and 3.7%, respectively, within the whole study population. Although having asthma with or without allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and passive tobacco exposure were not found to be related to hospitalization because of COVID-19, having a pet at home was found to decrease the risk of hospitalization (odds ratio, 0.191; 95% confidence interval, 0.047-0.779; P = .02). Spirometry tests revealed a higher forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity ratio and a peak expiratory flow reversibility in hospitalized patients than in nonhospitalized ones (P = .02 and P = .003, respectively). CONCLUSION: Asthma and allergic diseases do not seem to be risk factors for hospitalization in children because of COVID-19, and having a pet at home can be a protective effect. Pulmonary function testing seems to be important for monitoring lung damage after COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Asthma/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Coinfection/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Rhinitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Adolescent , Asthma/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/pathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Coinfection/diagnosis , Coinfection/pathology , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Disease Susceptibility/pathology , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume/physiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Male , Prospective Studies , Rhinitis, Allergic/complications , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Vital Capacity/physiology
14.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 56(2): 561-570, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33369279

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The association between arginase I (ARG1) and arginase II (ARG2) genes and asthma has been reported in previous studies, but associations between polymorphisms in ARG genes and preschool wheezing (PSW) phenotypes are still unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between genetic variation in ARG1 and ARG2 genes and PSW phenotypes. METHODS: We enrolled 83 patients and 86 healthy controls. The patient group included two subgroups: episodic wheezing (EW) (n = 42, median age 41 months) and multiple-trigger wheezing (MW) (n = 41, median age 39 months). We genotyped six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ARG1 and six SNPs in ARG2. Eighteen haplotypes for ARG1 and 31 haplotypes for ARG2 were constituted, and the distributions of SNPs and haplotypes in patients and controls were analyzed. RESULTS: The frequency of the homozygote cytosine-cytosine (CC) genotype of ARG1 rs2781667T>C SNP and the ARG1 haplotype 4 in the MW group was significantly higher than the EW group (p = .002; odd ratios [OR]: 5.25; confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-14.51 and p < .001; OR: 7.77; CI: 2.54-23.74, respectively). The frequency of the ARG1 haplotype 5 was significantly higher but the frequency of ARG1 haplotype 9 was significantly lower in the all patients than in the healty controls (p = .019; OR: 10.34; CI: 1.28-83.53 and p = .015; OR: 0.093; CI:0.01-0.74, respectively). The frequency of the ARG1 haplotype 2 was significantly higher in the EW group than in the MW group (p = .014; OR: 5.68; CI: 1.48-21.8). CONCLUSION: Variations in ARG1 may potentially be related to phenotypes and risk of PSW.


Subject(s)
Arginase/genetics , Respiratory Sounds/genetics , Adult , Child, Preschool , Female , Genotype , Haplotypes , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Phenotype , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
15.
Turk J Pediatr ; 62(5): 701-710, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33108072

ABSTRACT

Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is a differentiated rhinitis phenotype defined by perennial or seasonal rhinitis symptoms without systemic atopy. The diagnosis can be made by a positive response to the nasal allergen challenge (NAC) (the gold standard for diagnosis) in the absence of skin prick test and/or serum allergenspecific immunoglobulin E. Clinical and epidemiological studies have demonstrated that LAR affects individuals from different countries, races, and age ranges. Several studies have shown that the onset of nasal symptoms occurs during childhood in a significant proportion of LAR individuals. Evidence of LAR has been growing, especially in pediatric and Asian populations. A review of the literature reveals that most LAR studies of pediatric populations have appeared in the last three years. The prevalence of LAR in children ranges from 3.7% to 66.6%, and similar to what has been observed in adults, prevalence is higher in Western countries. Publications have shown that LAR in children can be either seasonal or perennial, and diagnosis of LAR confirmed by NAC have been reported with numerous allergens (house dust mites, pollens, molds, and dander). These findings illustrate that LAR is an important differential diagnosis in children with presumed non-allergic rhinitis, and a through review of the very recent literature can contribute to the clinical identification and diagnosis of LAR in children with no evidence of systemic atopy, as well as update readers` knowledge of the topic.


Subject(s)
Immunoglobulin E , Rhinitis, Allergic , Allergens , Child , Humans , Nasal Provocation Tests , Rhinitis, Allergic/diagnosis , Rhinitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Skin Tests
16.
Asia Pac Allergy ; 10(3): e31, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32789116

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies revealed there are many gaps in the awareness and knowledge regarding the diagnosis and management of drug allergy (DA) among various health-care professionals. OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards DA among residents and interns of 3 university hospitals in the region of Trakya (Thrace), Turkey. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at university hospitals of 3 cities in the Trakya region: 1. Trakya University Medical Faculty, Edirne (n = 405), 2. Namik Kemal University Medical Faculty, Tekirdag (n = 114), and 3. Canakkale 18 Mart University Medical Faculty, Canakkale (n = 111). A Turkish questionnaire was developed based on previous published studies. RESULTS: The majority of participants (67%) had not received education on DA as a separate subject during their medical education. Less than a third (28.3%) of all respondents were satisfied with their knowledge concerning patients with clinical signs of DA. Of the 6 knowledge questions on DA, the average score for the study was 3.51 out of 6 (58.5%). Residents had a higher knowledge score (3.93 ± 1.1) compared with interns (3.05 ± 1.2) (p < 0.001). The lowest percentage of correct answers were in response to questions on laboratory confirmation of drug-related anaphylaxis (14.5%) and the possibility of penicillin toleration in patients with a history of penicillin allergy (11.8%). The majority of participants (92%) believe that medical doctors should be educated in DA. There were no significant correlations between taking DA histories and the frequency during daily practice of encountering patients. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that DA knowledge and attitudes are not at satisfactory level among respondents, and we concluded the importance and necessity of reinforcement of DA education in pre- and postgraduate education of medical doctors.

18.
Allergy ; 75(10): 2503-2541, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32535955

ABSTRACT

In December 2019, China reported the first cases of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This disease, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has developed into a pandemic. To date, it has resulted in ~9 million confirmed cases and caused almost 500 000 related deaths worldwide. Unequivocally, the COVID-19 pandemic is the gravest health and socioeconomic crisis of our time. In this context, numerous questions have emerged in demand of basic scientific information and evidence-based medical advice on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Although the majority of the patients show a very mild, self-limiting viral respiratory disease, many clinical manifestations in severe patients are unique to COVID-19, such as severe lymphopenia and eosinopenia, extensive pneumonia, a "cytokine storm" leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome, endothelitis, thromboembolic complications, and multiorgan failure. The epidemiologic features of COVID-19 are distinctive and have changed throughout the pandemic. Vaccine and drug development studies and clinical trials are rapidly growing at an unprecedented speed. However, basic and clinical research on COVID-19-related topics should be based on more coordinated high-quality studies. This paper answers pressing questions, formulated by young clinicians and scientists, on SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, and allergy, focusing on the following topics: virology, immunology, diagnosis, management of patients with allergic disease and asthma, treatment, clinical trials, drug discovery, vaccine development, and epidemiology. A total of 150 questions were answered by experts in the field providing a comprehensive and practical overview of COVID-19 and allergic disease.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Hypersensitivity/complications , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Humans , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , SARS-CoV-2
19.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 31(5): 442-448, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32319129

ABSTRACT

While the world is facing an unprecedented pandemic with COVID-19, patients with chronic diseases need special attention and if warranted adaptation of their regular treatment plan. In children, allergy and asthma are among the most prevalent non-communicable chronic diseases, and healthcare providers taking care of these patients need guidance. At the current stage of knowledge, children have less severe symptoms of COVID-19, and severe asthma and immunodeficiency are classified as risk factors. In addition, there is no evidence that currently available asthma and allergy treatments, including antihistamines, corticosteroids, and bronchodilators, increase the risk of severe disease from COVID-19. Most countries affected by COVID-19 have opted for nationwide confinement, which means that communication with the primary clinician is often performed by telemedicine. Optimal disease control of allergic, asthmatic, and immunodeficient children should be sought according to usual treatment guidelines. This statement of the EAACI Section on Pediatrics puts forward six recommendations for the management of childhood allergies and immunodeficiencies based on six underlying facts and existing evidence.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes/therapy , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pediatrics/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Academies and Institutes , Adolescent , COVID-19 , Child , Child, Preschool , Europe , Humans , Infant , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SARS-CoV-2
20.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol ; 33(2): 69-79, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34678092

ABSTRACT

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease with complex pathogenesis. Natural flavonoids exhibit strong anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties in many human diseases. In this study, the potential bioactive effect of quercetin, a polyphenolic plant-derived flavonoid, on the AD model of human keratinocytes was evaluated. Methods: Immortalized human HaCaT keratinocytes were treated with interleukin (IL) -4, -13, and tumor necrosis factor-α to mimic AD features in vitro. Then effects of quercetin on inflammation, oxidative stress, and wound healing were assessed. Results: Pretreatment of the cells with 1.5 µM of quercetin significantly reduced the expression of AD-induced IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin, while it strongly enhanced the expression of superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1), SOD2, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and IL-10. Quercetin promoted wound healing by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition, which was supported by the upregulation of Twist and Snail mRNA expression. Unexpectedly, quercetin pretreatment of AD-induced cells upregulated the mRNA expression of occludin and E-cadherin, while downregulating matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1), MMP2, and MMP9 expression. The pretreatment inhibited AD-induced phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2/mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK1/2 MAPK) and the expression of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), but it did not alter signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) phosphorylation. Conclusion: Quercetin may serve as a potential bioactive substance for atopic dermatitis-related symptoms through anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities along with its acceleration of wound healing via ERK1/2 MAPK and NF-κB pathways.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Quercetin , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Humans , Inflammation/drug therapy , Keratinocytes , Oxidative Stress , Quercetin/pharmacology , Quercetin/therapeutic use , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...